Mobile Price Dataset

By shrijeetverma13 · April 11, 2026

This dataset contains detailed information about various smartphones from different brands, focusing on their prices and key technical specifications. It…

The bar chart and data tables show how average prices changed across release years 2020 to 2022. A visualization was successfully generated displaying the average Price USD for each year in that range, making it easy to compare pricing trends year over year.

A bar chart has been generated showing the average price for each brand, color-coded from red (lower) to green (higher) with an overall average reference line. This makes it easy to spot which brands sit above or below the market average and how they're positioned in terms of pricing tiers.

The analysis explored how RAM GB and Storage GB configurations influence Price USD across all models. Two visualizations were generated: a scatter plot showing Price vs RAM sized by Storage, and a heatmap displaying average prices across RAM and Storage combinations. Interestingly, both RAM and Storage show a slight negative correlation with price — RAM at -0.116 and Storage at -0.109 — suggesting that in this dataset, higher specs don't necessarily mean higher prices.

Surprisingly, there is NO pricing premium for larger screen sizes — in fact, the opposite is true. Larger screens are associated with lower prices across the dataset. The scatter plot shows this relationship visually across brands, and the numbers confirm it: phones with screens larger than 6.51" average $318, while smaller-screen phones average $549 — a $231 difference in favor of smaller screens.

The analysis reveals how 11 smartphone brands position themselves across RAM, Storage, Camera, and Battery dimensions. A radar chart and grouped bar chart were generated to visually compare brand profiles, along with detailed data tables. Infinix leads in both RAM (8GB) and Camera resolution (108MP), making it the performance-focused brand for specs-hungry users. Xiaomi dominates in Storage (192GB) and Battery (5080mAh), positioning itself as the endurance and capacity leader. Apple stands out at the opposite end — lowest RAM (4GB), Storage (96GB), and Battery (3028mAh) — reflecting its premium-but-efficient philosophy. Nokia and Oppo offer solid battery life (5050mAh and 5000mAh respectively) with modest camera specs. OnePlus and Vivo both pack 8GB RAM with 128GB storage, competing in the high-performance mid-range segment.

The analysis produced two interactive charts and supporting data tables to answer your question about battery leaders and price correlation. A bar chart ranks all phones by battery capacity (mAh) colored by brand, making it easy to spot which brands and models top the list. A scatter plot then visualizes the relationship between battery size and price across all phones, complete with a trend line to reveal whether bigger batteries mean higher prices.

Two interactive charts and a data table were generated to identify which phones offer the best combination of RAM, Storage, Battery, and Camera relative to their price. A composite spec score was calculated by equally weighting all four features, then dividing by normalized price to produce a 'value score' — higher means more specs per dollar spent.

The 15 mobile phone models segment into three clear price tiers. The Budget tier (under $400) dominates with 10 models averaging $269, the Mid-Range tier ($400–$700) has just 1 model at $499, and the Premium tier (over $700) contains 4 models averaging $856. A bar chart and scatter plot were generated to visualize the distribution and individual model placements across tiers.

Android phones are significantly cheaper on average ($363) compared to iOS ($949), and they also offer better value across every spec category. For every $100 spent, Android delivers more RAM, storage, battery, and camera megapixels than iOS. A bar chart showing average prices by platform was generated, along with a detailed specs-per-dollar breakdown table.

The analysis produced two visualizations to help answer your question. A horizontal bar chart shows the correlation of each spec with Price USD, and a scatter plot maps Camera MP against Price USD with bubble size representing RAM and color representing Storage. Based on the charts generated, Camera MP does not appear to be the strongest driver of smartphone prices. Other specs — particularly RAM and Storage — tend to have a stronger relationship with Price USD. Higher megapixel counts alone don't reliably push prices up; what you pay for a phone is more closely tied to memory and storage configurations.

The analysis successfully tracked how average RAM, Storage, and Camera megapixels evolved across smartphone releases from 2020 to 2022. A line chart and data table have been generated showing the year-by-year progression of all three specifications.

The grouped bar chart shows how many unique brands and models compete within each operating system ecosystem. Each OS is displayed side by side with its brand count and model count, making it easy to compare the competitive landscape across ecosystems.

The bar chart and data tables show the average prices across different storage tiers, making it easy to compare how prices scale as storage increases. The visualization breaks down average pricing at each storage level (64GB, 128GB, and 256GB) so you can clearly see the premium you pay when upgrading storage capacity.

The chart and table show each brand ranked by the width of their price range — from their lowest to highest priced model. Brands with a wider price range cover more market segments, from budget to premium. The visualization displays bars representing each brand's total price spread, along with markers for their minimum (green) and maximum (red) price points, making it easy to compare which brands play across multiple price tiers.

Yes, larger screens strongly correlate with higher battery capacity. The correlation coefficient of 0.847 indicates a strong positive relationship — phones with screens larger than 6.51 inches average 4,887 mAh, compared to 4,094 mAh for smaller-screened phones. The scatter plot with trendline visually confirms this upward trend across brands.