Titanic Dataset

By shrijeetverma13 · April 5, 2026

The sinking of the Titanic is one of the most infamous shipwrecks in history. On April 15, 1912, during her maiden voyage, the widely considered…

The analysis reveals a clear relationship between passenger class and survival on the Titanic. A bar chart and data table were generated showing survival rates across all three passenger classes, with 1st class passengers having the highest survival rate and 3rd class passengers the lowest.

The bar chart and data table show survival rates broken down by passenger class (1st, 2nd, 3rd) and sex. Women consistently had much higher survival rates than men across all classes, reflecting the 'women and children first' evacuation policy on the Titanic.

Survivors paid significantly higher fares on average ($48.40) compared to non-survivors ($22.12) — a difference of $26.28. This suggests that passengers who paid more for their tickets, typically those in higher classes, had better chances of survival. A bar chart has been generated to visually compare these averages.

A family size of 3 (combined SibSp + Parch) is associated with the highest survival rate at 72.4%, based on 29 passengers. The bar chart and data table generated clearly show how survival rates vary across different family sizes, with small families faring best and solo travelers or very large families having lower survival odds.

There is a dramatic survival gap between genders on the Titanic. Female passengers had a 74.2% survival rate (233 out of 314), while male passengers survived at only 18.9% (109 out of 577). The gap is 55.3 percentage points, meaning females were nearly 4x more likely to survive than males. A bar chart has been generated to visually compare these rates side by side.

The analysis produced two visualizations showing fare distribution across the three passenger classes: a box plot and a histogram overlay. These charts clearly show how ticket prices differed by class on the Titanic.

Cherbourg (C) had the highest survival rate at 55.4%, with 93 out of 168 passengers surviving. Southampton (S) had the lowest survival rate at just 33.7%, with 217 out of 644 passengers surviving. Queenstown (Q) fell in between. A bar chart and data table have been generated to visualize these differences clearly.

A data table was generated showing survival rates broken down by age group (Children 0-12, Adults 13-60, and Elderly 61+) for Titanic passengers with known ages. The table reveals how survival chances differed across these three demographic groups.

Traveling with family significantly IMPROVES survival chances on the Titanic. Passengers with family members aboard had a 50.6% survival rate, compared to just 30.4% for those traveling alone — a difference of 20.2 percentage points. Two bar charts were generated showing these comparisons visually.

Yes, children under 12 were generally prioritized for survival on the Titanic. Overall, children had a significantly higher survival rate of 57.4% compared to 38.9% for adults. Two bar charts were generated showing survival rates broken down by age group, class, and sex — making it easy to see how children fared across different passenger groups.

Yes, passengers with a recorded cabin had significantly higher survival rates. Those with a cabin recorded survived at 66.7% (136 out of 204), compared to just 30.0% (206 out of 687) for those without — a difference of 36.7 percentage points. A bar chart and data table have been generated to illustrate this striking contrast.

A data table was generated showing survival rates broken down by passenger titles (Mr, Mrs, Miss, Master, and Other) extracted from the Name field. The table reveals how survival varied significantly depending on a passenger's title, which serves as a proxy for gender and age group.

The analysis identified the top 10 highest-fare passengers on the Titanic and visualized their survival outcomes in a bar chart. Each bar is color-coded — green for survivors and red for those who did not survive — making it easy to see at a glance how fate differed among the wealthiest travelers. A data table is also available with details on each passenger including their class, cabin, age, and sex.

Yes, passengers with missing Age values have a noticeably lower survival rate than those with known ages. The data table shows that only 29.4% of passengers with missing ages survived (52 out of 177), compared to 40.6% of passengers with known ages (290 out of 714) — a difference of 11.24 percentage points.

Adult males aged 18 or older who were traveling alone (no family members) in third class had a survival rate of just 14.1% — meaning only 25 out of 177 passengers in this group survived. This is one of the lowest survival rates on the Titanic, reflecting the compounded disadvantages of gender, class, and traveling without family.

No, the 'women and children first' policy was NOT applied equally across all three passenger classes. The bar chart clearly shows that survival rates for women and children dropped dramatically in 3rd class compared to 1st and 2nd class, revealing a strong class bias in how the policy was actually implemented.

Yes, passengers sharing the same ticket number had significantly higher survival rates than solo ticket holders. Those on shared tickets survived at a rate of 52.0%, compared to only 29.8% for solo ticket holders — a difference of 22.2 percentage points. Two charts were generated: one comparing survival rates between shared and solo ticket holders, and another breaking down survival rates by ticket group size.

Two charts and supporting tables were generated showing how passenger class distribution across embarkation ports directly influenced survival rates. Cherbourg (C) had the highest overall survival rate at 55.4%, largely because about half its passengers were 1st class. Southampton (S) had the lowest survival at 33.7%, as nearly two-thirds of its passengers were 3rd class. Queenstown (Q) was almost entirely 3rd class passengers, which explains its low survival rate. Across all ports, Class 1 consistently had the highest survival and Class 3 the lowest — meaning embarkation port is essentially a proxy for socioeconomic status, which was the real driver of survival.